After February 24, three organizations joined forces to work with the experiences of war and launched a laboratory for artistic research ‘Land to Return, Land to Care’.
Museum of Odesa Modern Art
The large-scale invasion caught the Museum of Odesa Modern Art at the moment of a reboot. We had plans to move to new premises, switch to a new format of work, a new concept, new partnerships. The museum is in a state of constant search — it is a laboratory study of the artistic tradition of modern Odesa. The museum team tried to experiment with curatorial approaches, new ways of representation, new media, etc.
We established a scholarship for emerging Ukrainian artists and planned residencies where artists from different cities and countries could share experiences and create new meanings. We were all waiting to launch an art project researching the role of sound in today’s world, and with our UK partners SoundCamp and Acoustic Commons we were planning to explore the soundscape of the Kinburn Spit.
Currently, ‘combat work is underway’ on the Kinburn spit. After February 24, everything changed. We found ourselves inside an experience we hadn’t had before, but our focus on lab work proved even more relevant. Not answers, but questions are all we can afford today. We set out on this strange journey, which we did not expect at all, with partners who had been working in the laboratory format for years — the NGO ‘Slushni Rechi’ and the cultural memory platform Past / Future / Art.
Slushni Rechi
NGO
One of the observations during the full-scale invasion has been a particular focus on experiencing loss together and alongside various life forms that make up our ecosystem — plants, soil, bodies of water. This shared experience of empathy is witnessed both by art projects that, since the beginning of the invasion, address the topic of the changing landscape and the rethinking of the concepts of land and territory, as well as by public reactions to visual documentation — for example, photographs of a shelled field — or to messages about what we cannot currently see: fires in nature reserves, deep pollution, loss of plant and animal diversity.
Attempting to find words to define this specific shared experience and to include them in one’s own vocabulary can sometimes be risky and fraught with mistakes. Nevertheless, grasping the definitions as they are being formed at the intersection of different practices and disciplines — scientific, poetic, visual — can be productive.
Currently, we see this shared experience as a node of many personal experiences of shifting sensitivity and new knowledge that we extract here and now, making sense of Ukraine’s place in the global political, infrastructural, and ecological interconnections. Getting to this node and identifying it with the help of words, images, and sounds was the goal of the participants and the curatorial team of the laboratory.
Today we can observe how the surrounding phenomena are redefined in a paradoxical way. On the one hand, we perceive sounds around us, changes in the weather, once very familiar locations in a new light. Are they safe or are they a threat? On the other hand, we are traumatized by the loss of urban spaces and landscapes in which we were formed and, as it turned out, rooted. Such changes and the fact that we, along with the environment, have become a military target for damage and exhaustion, further contribute to the focus on the materiality of things.
It is currently impossible to understand the scale of losses — this is also true for environmental losses for which there is no available monitoring. But understanding losses also requires an understanding of the distinct temporality in which other species and forms of life exist. How will military equipment dumps affect the soil and the groundwater? To what extent will the hostilities and fires in nature reserves reduce diversity? How will the Azov and Black seas change due to the release of chemicals, oil, shipwrecks, and mines? This will leave a long-term record on the body of the Earth, and as a result, in our bodies and the bodies of future generations.
Theorizing pollution as a weapon in the war against Ukraine, researcher Svitlana Matviyenko points to how the slow nature of violence caused by the release of toxic chemicals, such as from missile strikes, often renders the damage imperceptible to human attention. Just as extreme incidents of violence that occur instantaneously — such as bombings — can be ‘invisible’ because of their ability to provoke shock and trauma: witnesses of war crimes often report that in their memories days collapse into a single sense of continuity (Svitlana Matviyenko, ‘Pollution as a Weapon of War’. Climate. Our Right to Breathe, L’Internationale Online, K. Verlag, 2022, 53-62).
Revealing what falls out of sight and is invisible seems to be another important task of the art laboratory and its participants.
Exploring the node of acquired knowledge and new sensitivity here and now can also influence our relationship with the environment, prompting us to build relationships based on equality and care instead of exploitation and depletion. This is especially relevant in the context of future rebuilding and restoration, when that what makes up our landscape will become building material.
Past / Future / Art
Cultural memory platform
After February 24, 2022, everyone in Ukraine found themselves in a world without guarantees, and every dot of Ukrainian space became a target. It is clear to everyone that now the very existence of Ukraine is at stake, and the demarcation line between the past and the future is being drawn.
Those lucky enough to be alive feel like slightly different beings compared to what they used to be before February 24. They feel the world with all their senses — because the world has changed to hearing and touch, many things in it have turned upside down. And now we are not talking about the usual ‘how is this possible in the 21st century?’. If it could happen in the 20th century, why is it not possible in the 21st? As if after World War I, it was not clear that war is bad. Yet, did it prevent the catastrophe of WWII?
Now those who live must try to stay alive — to resist. We are no longer the Aristotelian zoon politicon (political animal) who clearly distinguishes between their spiritual and animal nature, and understands how to act to achieve personal and collective happiness. We found ourselves alone with despair and our wounds, with a reconsidered and reloaded sense of dignity — our own dignity, the dignity of others, not only humans. It is about the experience of a living being — not the one that, according to Kant, said goodbye to natural childhood. So far we know for sure that evil exists. Evil is not a lack of good, an error in an otherwise normal world. Evil is substantial and real. Meeting it changes many things in us. We began to feel the world as living beings. ‘Living’ is the key word. Because we feel life differently — and feel pain differently.
On February 24, we found ourselves in a reality where there were no rational explanations, but there was an extreme concentration of being — right here, at the point of pain and resistance. This is what happens at the moment of injury: without even seeing what exactly injured us, we become beings focused on the point of pain. Not carriers of the mind, but the essence of being and the impossibility of action. The moment we are able to make the first effort of interpretation, we will have hope for survival. But at the moment of the impossibility of movement, we become total listening, sensing.
When we are living beings who constantly feel like targets, our vulnerability due to our own materiality becomes apparent. The fine line between life and non-existence turns out to be, not a metaphorical construct, but a very real feeling of your own skin as something that does not really separate you from the rest of the world. A missile strike can mix organic and inorganic into a single senseless and dead mass. Your own materiality is experienced anew as vulnerability and inseparability from the surrounding matter.
This inseparability gives us a feeling of extreme closeness to non-life, but at the same time, we acquire forms of sensitivity that were not so obvious before. We look at the shelled field and feel pain. The earth is an extension of our body whose pain we feel. People in Ukraine are beginning to ask themselves: what is earth? the Earth? Where are we between mythology, economics, and the prosaic reality of the soldier’s trench?
It is tempting to talk about a special consciousness emerging right now, about us transforming into different beings who have acquired extra sensitivity and are able to feel the thoughts of non-humans. It is important for us to refrain from this temptation. The very knowledge of how different a creature — say, a plant — is compared to us allows us to say: we have no idea what it is ‘thinking’. There is an area of phenomenology that captures the phenomenon of plant thinking — a metaphor that describes an ultimately non-human rationality. Experiments with listening to energies are not within our competence.
We ask ourselves what exactly this experience of pain at the sight of a shelled field means to us. This is not rage about a spoiled resource. There is something very important about us here — about how this kinship with the ultimate other works. We are reclaiming lands that are not property — they are the space of ourselves, a part of us, and we are a part of them. Protecting the earth from poisoning is not counting on its gratitude. It is about responsibility and understanding the inviolability of what we are not.
The temptation to use myths is too great, but so is the understanding of their inappropriateness. So what has art to do with it? Will it save us from war? Of course, it won’t. It will not stop, will not protect, will not raise the dead. Extreme pain cannot be stopped by art.
Art allows us to move and look for questions, the answers to which we feel, but cannot formulate until we have found the actual questions. Nothing is behind us yet, we are in the midst of an event that not all of us will survive. It so happened that art itself can grasp what neither science nor any analytics have reached. Art does not predict, but catches the most important emotion, allows us to share the experience that we all have, but may or may not become a field of reflection. Shared experiences allow us to take a step forward, capture something important, or shake off the accidental. Perhaps right now life and art are coming very close to each other. Art grows out of a touch with reality. Reality appears before us as recognizable-unrecognizable in an artistic gesture.
The lab ‘Land to Return, Land to Care’ brought together curators, artists, and researchers who through dialogue looked for ways to comprehend the war and reflected on changes in their own lives and the environment.
About the labwebsite by

